Undecided

Sacha and the Bear

Originally uploaded by x11tech

I work from home. I spend most of my day in my office, but every once in a while I leave. Restroom breaks, water, food, and to go looking for my girlfriend’s little dog to see what mischief she’s been up to lately.

Yesterday, I found her under a stuffed bear.

So cute!

I found the following article among the printed material I’m sorting and discarding.  I think the article is relevant even today, especially as my career path hasn’t changed from being technical since I first read this.  I think I once sent this to a former employer (Firstworld) after I was asked if there was anything that they could do to keep me (I had just given notice of intent to quit, having accepted an opportunity with Shared Technologies.  Firstworld had valued me with neither an appropriate compensation package nor a title commensurate with my responsibilities.

The summation of my response was “No, there is nothing you can do, but here are the problems which caused me to look elsewhere. While there is nothing you can do for me, I hope my departure will act as a warning signal and that you will no lose the skills of my subordinate whom I leave behind.  As I have fully trained him in all aspects of my job, you would be wise to give him a title and pay appropriate to his skills and responsibilities.  I would happily act as a referal for him should he begin looking.”  And then I attached this article.  (At least, I think it was this article.)

How to keep employees after you’ve trained them

by Loraine Lawson
June 28, 2000

Companies give two reasons for requiring employees to sign contracts stating they will work for a specified period in exchange for training: to recoup the costs of training and to deter the employee from leaving.

But employee experts say this practice is at best ineffective and at worst a detriment to recruiting and retaining good employees. Instead, experts recommend that businesses create in-house training programs and change the way they approach compensation.

Contracts don’t work
If you’re using contracts to deter employees from leaving, you may ultimately be hurting your chances of recruiting new workers, according to Gartner vice president and research directory Diane Tunick Morello.

“I think it does affect your ability to recruit. In a free market, no one wants to walk into something that would be a negative,” Morello said. “It is a disincentive. If I go to an organization that promises to train me, to equip me to be able to do their work, then that’s the cost of doing business.”

[Pie chart insert:  Who paid for your last certification? 56% You did. 17% Your company reimbursed you. 27% Your company paid up front.]

A 1999 poll of TechRepublic members showed that most paid for their own certifications.

You’re also likely to get a bad reputation in the all-too-small IT community if you sue a former employee to enforce the contract, according to H. Michael Boyd, a human resourcing strategies research with International Data Corporation.

“Most companies don’t bother because you’re going to sit there and say, ‘I don’t have that kind of money, sue me,’” said Boyd, who also holds a doctorate in sociology. “The cost of them going to court, the bad public relations, the bad employee relations, and everything else make it untenable. They’re not going to do it.”

Opinions from your peers
[paragraph redacted as it is no longer relevant and included links to another article on TechRepublic]

Such contracts will help you at least recoup the cost of training in the short term, but ultimately, training is just part of doing business.

“The same companies that are whining about their people leaving after they get certified are the very same people that say to other people’s employees, ‘Oh I see you have a certification.  I’ll pay you more money,” Boyd said.

In the past, companies realized that ultimately, everyone shared the cost of training workers, he said.

“What you knew as an industry was that it was going to even out,” Boyd said. “So you were going to hire someone from another company because they had a certification and someone was going to hire one of your employees because they had the certification.”

Boyd suggests that the same still holds true: “You’re going to pay your share in to the training market no matter what.”

If you decide to use such training contracts, Boyd recommends you take the following precautions:

• Tell employees about training contracts before you hire them.
• Make sure the contracts apply to everyone.

The best way to recoup your training investment is to find ways to keep your employees happy and challenged. Otherwise, you’re losing much more than the cost of training the employee.

[Insert: The cost of turnover

When an employee leaves, you're losing more than the money you invested in training. A 1998 Gartner report on IT staff retention and recruitment found replacing an employee can be 100 percent to 250 percent of the departing person's salary.  Here are a few of the expenses you could face:

• Paying a new employeee 15-35 percent more than your former employee
• A recruiter's fee of 20-30 percent of the new employee's salary
• Interview expenses
• A learning curve of 50 percent loss of productivity for three to six months
• Relocation fees
• And, ironically enough, payback of sign-on bonus and training fees to the new employee's previous employer.

Source: Gartner]

But how you keep the competition from luring away? The analysts we spoke with suggest that businesses provide more in-house instruction to cut training costs and creatively compensate employees after they obtain new skills.

Create in-house apprenticeships
You can stretch your training dollars by cultivating an atmosphere of continuous learning, rather than viewing training as an “event” that employees can attend once or twice a year, Morello suggested.

She compared the practice to an in-house apprenticeship program that allows employees to learn on the job from each other.

“You get a lot more out of someone’s training and expertise and education, if, for instance, you put them into continuous learning environments where they learn on the job in new rotations, new assignments, or in an apprenticeship fashion and you’re not paying or writing a check for some course that someone was going to,” she said. “You’re actually giving them the opportunities, the education, and the learning in the context of the way work is done.”

Creative compensation
Instead of using contracts to keep people, companies should examine why employees want to leave, recommended Don Sheppard, chief executive officer of Sheppard Associates, an international employee relations consultant firm based in Glendale, CA, whose clients include Fortune 500 companies.

“It’s very simply understanding what people want in a job or career and being able to respond to that within your own organization,” he said.

Often, employees leave because they do not feel a company offers them opportunities, challenges, or respect, Sheppard said. One way to fill those needs-even if you are a small company-is to move away from a management-track career path and establish what Sheppard called dual-career opportunities.  Sheppard describes a dual-career track as rewarding employees based on their contribution to the company’s success, as opposed to a management track, which essentially rewards employees based on their titles.

“An individual contributor is often more valuable than a manager and so companies set up what are called dual ladder career tracks,” he said.  Why shouldn’t someone in an organization who is contributing to the success of the organization be paid as much as somebody who may have gone into a management track?

This approach can give smaller companies a big advantage if they’re willing to take it. Ironically, they still tend to base compensation on the company’s hierarchy, Sheppard said.

“Small companies are much more able to offer a challenging environment than large companies can because they’re more flexible,” he said. “Small companies need to realize that being an individual contributor is as valuable as following any management track.”

The smart companies compensate employees based on their contributions, not their titles, Sheppard said. The rest will continue to lose out.

“The contract that keeps people with organizations is how they get treated once they join an organization,” Sheppard said.

Would you trade time time for training?
[Paragraph redacted as it is no longer relevant and included links back to TechRepublic]

I decided to give it a spin on my last post to see whether or not I’d like it.  While I think I’d still prefer to have a user level plugin (and may eventually code one to ensure that I can do it the way I’d want) I’ve decided to convert all of the personal posts about my girlfriend to password protected posts for the time being (presently, they’re all private and not accessible to anyone, even me… so for all intents and purposes, they’re unpublished.)

What I’d like is to have a way to ensure that my friends can see updates about my personal life (and my girlfriend) without sharing that information with the rest of the world.  I realize that for any random stranger who wanders by and reads my desire to post information on the internet (and especially blogging about that information) but restrict that information will be scratching their head.  The whole point of blogging most of the time is to get information out there…  whether that information is about yourself or a topic you’re manic about…

On the other hand, Undecided is not like other blogs.  It’s really just a notepad for myself and occasionally I like to throw out information about my personal life.  But the problem is, I don’t really have any desire to tell the world about me.  The reason this is on the internet as opposed to a computer that I own is because I wanted the notepad accessible wherever I go, so that should I want to look up things that I’ve written in the past from a friend’s house, I could do that.