South Park seems to have taken on my two least favorite celebrities in the world of Hollywood and done it with style (that is, if you think South Park is stylish. 89% of the time, I don’t.)  The Los Angeles Times online posted an article on one of it’s blogs commenting on the South Park episode [NSFW] released earlier this month (I don’t normally watch South Park, so I’ve not seen the episode) but after reading the article and subsequent comments, this is what I’ve come up with.

In it’s usual graphically inappropriate and highly sophomoric humor style, South Park attempts to bring to your attention just what Lucas and Spielberg have done with our beloved Indiana Jones franchise with the latest installment, Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull [I don't think that it deserves further advertisement than I'm giving through this entry, so if you want a link to it, please use Google.]  While the author of the LA Times article appears to have poorly reported some of the particulars about the South Park article, he appears to have grasped the essentials where South Park, through a highly controversial euphemism, depicts characatures of Lucas and Spielberg violating the Indiana Jones franchise.

I guess the question is whether the South Park script is more offensive than what Lucas and Spielberg have done to Indiana Jones.  Still, as offensive as the episode is, I cannot help but feel that it effectively dramatizes what I think of the fourth movie and what Lucas/Spielberg did to ‘Indie.’

As if I needed one more reason to hate Lucas (or one more reason to avoid South Park.)

 

This is not one of those posts about a cute magnetic shaped like the Earth (or maybe a cute magnet with a map of the Earth, or some variation of that theme).  Instead, this is a map of the magnetic fields of the Earth.  Compiled from more than 50 years of data, this map

was brought to my attention by the people over at io9.  io9 breaks down the map to say that the the Red highlights are stronger magnetic fields and Blue are weaker fields.  If we assume that they’re usinga ROYGBIV color scheme for showing strength, then the Yellow represents the stronger side of average while Green represents the weaker side of average, while a Yellow-Green represents exactly average.  (But you know where assumptions get us.)

If you want to see the minature veresion of the map they have for sale, check this out.

There’s no evidence of anything truly bizarre at the Burmuda Triangle according to these maps, there are other places with much more substantial plus strength field (larger areas of red) and still others with more regular plus/minus fields (where the tectonic plates have been moving in the Pacific ocean E-by-SE of Australia, the lower left portion of the map above.)

 

To prove that I’m not pro-Mac:

Gizmodo gives you the raw deal on just what you get when you buy a MAC, and how far your dollar gets you when buying MAC vs PC.

Seems especially relevant in today’s economy.

 

I’m not pro-MAC, but neither am I pro-Vista:

 

CINNAMON ROLL RECIPE

INGREDIENTS

2 cups all-purpose flour
2 tablespoons white sugar
4 teaspoons baking powder
1 teaspoon salt
1/4 cup butter, chilled
1 cup cold milk
1/3 cup margarine
1 cup packed brown sugar
3 teaspoons ground cinnamon
1/3 cup currants
1/2 cup confectioners’ sugar
3 tablespoons milk

DIRECTIONS

1. Cream 1/3 cup butter or margarine, brown sugar, and cinnamon together. Drop 1 teaspoon into each of 12 greased muffin tins. Reserve the remaining mixture.

2. In a large bowl, combine flour, sugar, baking powder, and salt. Cut in 1/4 cup butter or margarine until crumbly. Make a well in center, and pour in milk. Stir to form a soft dough, adding a bit more milk if needed.

3. Turn dough out on lightly floured surface. Knead 8 to 10 times. Roll into rectangle about 1/3 inch thick and 12 inches long. Spread the remaining cinnamon mixture over dough rectangle. Sprinkle currants or raisins over top. Roll up as for jelly roll. Mark first, then cut into 12 slices. Place cut side down in muffin pan.

4. Bake in 400 degrees F (205 degrees C) for 20 to 25 minutes. Turn out on a tray.

5. To confectioners sugar, add enough milk or water to make a thin glaze. Drizzle over cinnamon rolls.

 

Over at the UK Telegraph, journalists have been talking with programmers over at the Leeds Metropolitan University about a computer program being written to analyze an incoming signal from outer space to determine if it’s audio, video, or raw text.  And, if it’s a language being sent, put a syntax to it to start the process of translating it to something that humans can understand.

According to the programmer, of the 60 languages on Earth that have been evaluated to write this program, all of them have a syntax which is mathematically similar.  Adjectives are near nouns; functional terms that bracket phrases.  Like “if” and “but” (which, when you think about it, are merely linguistic methods of describing mathematical or logical concepts.)  “If these, then this, else that” and “This but not that.”

It sounds a lot like the kind of code breaking that was done during World War II, and if the Germans had possessed something like this back then, they might have realized that the Navajo language used as a code by the Allied forces was in fact a language and not a code…

Likewise, if this program works as described, if we ever discover life in outer space, the odds are that this will help us to decipher what they are saying.

Who would have guessed that all of the imagination that went in to Star Trek would one day bear fruit in reality?

 

Brought the 0.10.2 revision over to the production site as it fixes a number of critical bugs.  I’m still working on 0.11.0, which begins the implementation of the ESN parser.  All database tables have been generated and the upgrade code has been written in to the core plugin code so that when it’s moved over to the production site, it’ll be automatically upgraded to the latest/greatest.

 

Wired posted the aftermath of an exchange between the McCain-Palin campaign and YouTube.  The net-net of the article is that McCain was a signatory on the DMCA (copyright act) which places certain obligations on to content intermediaries such as YouTube.  Succinctly, if you host content, and if someone makes a claim to you that the content is in violation of the DMCA, you have 10 days to take it down or risk losing your “safe harbor” protection from lawsuit.

Apparently there isn’t much wiggleroom in the wording and as a result, YouTube is forced to (just due to the size of it’s operation they cannot review every DMCA notice they receive for validity prior to the 10 day safe harbor window) take content down first and then investigate after..  and only if the contributor objects to the removal of content.  In essence, the DMCA notification process can be abused.

And apparently some anti-McCain visitors to the YouTube website have done just that (not to mention all of those who have unlawfully had their copyrighted material “borrowed” for the McCain-Palin campaign), filing a report against the McCain-Palin campaign contributions to YouTube.

Of course, YouTube General Counsel decided to add a little snarkiness at the end of their letter back to the General Counsel for the McCain-Palin campaign (since McCain was partially responsible for the DMCA becoming law):

We hope that as a content uploader, you have gained a sense of some of the challenges we face everyday in operating YouTube

 

io9 re-posted an article recently about a medical breakthrough allowing brain-computer-interfaces to be built that bridge existing nerve tissue in a limb with the brain, bypassing an injury.  These brain-to-muscle connections eliminate the need for prosthetic limbs where the original limb still exists, but is unusable because of some trauma.  Previous experiments in the BCI technology have permitted subjects to control prosthetic limbs, but this is the first brain-to-muscle type interface.

The re-post did have a few inaccuracies when retyped from the original article (which they fail to link to.  But a Google search finds a likely candidate.)  According to that article, practical applications are at least 10 years away (probably a little less if they didn’t account for the increasing rate of discovery.)

Still, the possibilities are quite interesting.  Not only can you remotely control human bodies once this technology is perfected (i.e., transmit my motor control signals to your body), but you could also bypass nerve damage and return motor control to paralysis victims, and remotely control prosthetic limbs (for construction, hazardous activity or even surgery.)

 

If you know nothing about Buckminster Fuller then I entreat you to visit Wikipedia and read the recount of his life and work.  While it may not be wholely accurate, it will contain many references that can be reviewed for accuracy.  Interestingly enough, although certain geodesic dome patterns were named Bucky Balls after Fuller, the football (soccarball) was an occurance of this geodesic pattern long before Fuller coined the terms or studied the architectural integrity of its design.

Today, as proponents of Fuller have previously suggested, we continue to see expansion on the work of a genius.  In Florida, they’re making Buckypaper which are constructed of Carbon Nanotube which are members of the fullerene structural family.  Essentially, these Carbon Nanotubes are built out of the same geodesic pattern that forms Bucky Balls, but instead of being formed in to a spherical shape, they’re formed in to that of a tube.

According to the scientists who continue to expand on the work named after Fuller, they discover practical applications of his utopian theories.  This breakthrough, if it reaches a commercial application, could result in new structural components for airplanes and cars that are significantly lighter and stronger (approximately 50 times stronger by weight) which means that in order to obtain the same structure integrity as current vehicles, we’d need only 2% of a cars current structural weight.  (A rough calculation: If we assume that a car is 1900 lbs and the engine and other internal components weighs another 1000 lbs, then the car structure could be reduced to 38 lbs and yet still maintain it’s existing structural integrity.)

I don’t know about you, but if you could reduce the weight of a car by a half ton, your fuel efficiency would go way up…  and, you wouldn’t need anywhere near as much horse power to propel your vehicle, so you’d end up reducing the weight of the engine to compensate for the reduced structural weight… which would only drive down the engine weight, the need for additional horsepower, and increase the fuel efficiency.

Plus, with current make engines, you could dramatically improve the structural integrity of a vehicle (making it safer) and still save on weight and fuel.

Favorite Books

Favorite Music

© 2011 Undecided Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha