7 online blunders, by Consumer Reports.

a summary

  1. Assuming your security software is protecting you.  Most people don’t keep their security software updated, but expect that it will continue to do the same job as when they got it.
  2. Accessing a financial account (or consumer website account) via a link embedded in your email.  With the number of fraudulently constructed emails out there (SPAM) that look legit, using an embedded link may result in identity thieves obtaining vital information about you.
  3. Using a single password for all online accounts.  Duh.
  4. Downloading free software.  Anything coming from a less reputable source than SnapFiles or Downloads.com (original authors suggestions, not mine) may contain spyware.  Get a spyware detecting software package and clean all of that out.
  5. Thinking your MAC shields you from all risk.  I find it hilarious the author dedicated a single entry to MAC.
  6. Clicking on a pop-up add that says your PC is insecure.  Pop up ads are rarely innocent, ads that prey on your lack of knowledge or emotional insecurity regarding your computer are never innocent.
  7. Shopping online the same way you do in stores. Don’t use a debit card, don’t use the same credit card you use for all other purchases, etc. etc.

 

An interesting article which shows what can be done with math and music together.  Paul Slocum has generated a formula that converts the number PI (3.1415926535897932384626433832795 …) to a constantly evolving house track.  A sample of this music can be found here.  In short, the author takes the number PI from the first digit to the farthest it can calculate (3, then 3.1, then 3.14, then 3.141, then 3.1416, then 3.14159, etc) and determines which house-like samples should be played.  This results in a constantly evolving house track that never repeats.

The segment that I listened to wasn’t bad and it flowed together rather nicely.

 

Hongkiat.com posted 30 (more) “most wanted” features for WordPress.  Some of them look like they’re already planned for Release 2.7 (upcoming) and others look interesting.

I’m especially interested in:

  • Breadcrumb navigation which is a cool way to place breadcrumb style navigation on your blog.  I like the idea of having a navigation bar that shows you the tree-branch you’re on (Home > About > TV, for instance).
  • Advanced Category Excluder provides a way to exclude pages from search results or from displaying on a page.  This isn’t exactly what I’m interested in, but I like the idea of making some content private.  This blog did originally start off as a way to keep my friends up to date on what I was doing, since we had drifted in different directions.  Now I use it mostly as a notepad, which is nice for me, but not so hot for keeping my friends informed on my personal business while not keeping the rest of the world informed.

 

Here’s a CLI version of wordpress.  Now that’s ultra-retro-geeky.

 

Wagreflex is an excellent resource for understanding pets.  Granted that the contributors have a very dim  view of the intelligence of animals (which is not to say that they think animals are stupid, but they have a very… I’m sure they would say “realistic” view of what animals understand.  And frankly, I find myself in agreement with them often.)

I would liken a dog or cat to (at best) a 5 year old.  Certain things they understand by instinct (much more than a human child will understand by instinct), but other things they have to learn through trial and error, and lacking a common language, it’s a lot more error than you might have with a child.

Enter the Ten Things Every Dog Owner Should Know list from Wagreflex.  In summary:

  1. A dog is a dog.  They are smart and can learn, but they don’t think like humans and you do a disservice to them to treat them as humans.
  2. All dogs think in terms of the pack.  As a dog owner, it’s your job to be the pack leader.  Dogs are ill equipped to be the alpha where man is concerned.  They cannot effectively communicate to us their orders and they cannot (with the exception of some dogs which are in danger ouf being put to sleep for trying to) dominate anyone.  A dog owner however is well equipped to be the Alpha of the pack.
  3. Dogs don’t understand English. Understand how a dog communicates so that you don’t send mixed signals.
  4. Dogs are not spiteful.  Dogs act out because of bordom or fear.  The reason a dog will not obey is because (a) it does not consider you a superior within the pack heirarchy, (b) it does not understand you, or (c) it’s stressed or afraid.
  5. What makes some dogs aggressive? Fight or flight instinct caused by the unknown.  No breed is more agressive than any other, only our perception of it’s agressiveness is different based on the size of the dog and the dogs potential to do harm.
  6. Body language is the dog’s primary mode of communication.  How you respond physically is as important or more important than what you say and how you say it.  If you push a dog away after they jump on you, they may interpret this as playful behavior.  (The author doesn’t suggest this, but I would instead suggest that you order them to sit and stay, in a firm but even voice, to indicate the behavior is not acceptable.  No reward necessary for responding to your instructions, in this case you’re not trying to teach them to sit and stay before playing, nor do you want them to think that the result of them jumping on you and then sitting is that you’ll play with them.)
  7. You can teach an old dog new tricks. Dogs cannot think, but they can learn.
  8. Bad behaviors may be natural, but they do not have to be normal. By correcting a dog instantly and firmly when it expresses undesired behavior, and reinforcing behavior that you consider good, you can teach your pet to associate desired behavior with praise and rewards and bad behavior with reprimands. 
  9. What is the right way to discipline a dog?  Your hands should always be associated with gentleness and pleasure (scratching, rubbing, playing, etc.)  Never use your hands to punish.  Always catch the dog in the act and deliver the reprimand immediately.  Don’t wait, and don’t reprimand for something that is not fresh in the dogs mind (either thinking about doing it right now, or doing it.)  When you cannot catch the dog doing something it shouldn’t, you can set the dog up for failure and then correct them (this seems spiteful in human thinking, but a dog won’t reason that it was set up, nor will it think bad of you for fair and firm discipline.  Remember the pack mentality.)  Discipline is not abuse, it’s part of establishing your place within the pack.
  10. Do dogs sense the world differently than humans? Yes.  They have a much strong sense of smell and hearing than humans do.  Also, while their visual accuity is good, it’s not as rich as a humans, but they have better night vision than a human does.  (I’m not sure how the original author knows that a dog cannot see color.)

I think I disagree with #4 as a blanket statement, but I think it’s a fair generalization.  I know some animals who will continue to do things that they shouldn’t for reasons that only make sense if you consider them spiteful.  I can understand chewing your shoe when you take a two week vacation and the dog misses you and your smell, but when you’re there daily and they destroy furniture, etc.  It just doesn’t make a lot of sense.  It also doesn’t make a lot of sense when a dog can hold their waste eliminations when enclosed in a car or carry bag, but leave their waste at the foot of your bed on a regular basis (despite the fact that when you catch them, you reprimand and then bring them to where they should go and praise them there to reinforce positive behavior and discourage negative behavior.)

I think that animals are definitely different from humans and definitely operate on different rules, but I think it’s equally a mistake to completely absolve them of all forms of human like behavior.

 

Turns out that when I purchased the Heroes Season 2 Blu-Ray DVD I got jipped.  Heroes Podcast pointed out in one of their regular episodes that NBC decided to put content on the regular DVD that they didn’t put on the Blu-Ray DVD.

I go to say, this makes me leary of purchasing additional BRDVDs in the near future.  And frankly, if I’m not going to buy the BRDVD, I probably just won’t buy.  So instead of getting this fan to buy the same product twice, they’re going to lose out on a sale entirely.

Corporate stupidity at it’s finest.

So what am I missing on the BluRay version that I’m all up-in-arms about?  The Season 3 premiere teaser content.  In retrospect it’s not a huge loss, but when I buy something, I’d like to think that Blu-Ray (or HDDVD) is the same content as the standard definition, only better quality and more of that content…  but when I find out that they intentionally omitted content from the BRDVD version and then charge me approximately 15$ more for less content…  I’m a little miffed.

 

Thank you Ron Paul;

I agree something has to be done, but I don’t think a “no strings attached” bailout of 700B for the executives who caused this problem in the first place is the answer.  If you hand those executives $700,000,000,000 without any oversight or strings attached, you’re not fixing the problem, you’re only going to make it worse (or at best, prolong the issue for another 4 years until it’s election time again and the issue comes back to haunt us.)

 

Back in the days of Atari ST and Apple IIe computers, piracy was not as big a concern, and games from computer giants like Electronic Arts and Maxis (SimCity) were not copy protected, and they made a lot of money.

Evidence: http://i35.tinypic.com/s2unfc.jpg (thanks to Digg for finding this article)

Now, 20 years later, these publishers prevent you from using the game you purchase without adhering to strict set of policies determined by the publisher (and because of DRM, these games will not work if the DRM servers that support these games go down.)

Considering the hoopla over Spore, it occurs to me (not that I have the programming experience to pull it off) that if some trojan/virii genius could pull off a mass infection to turn multiple computers in to zombies, that pointing those zombies at Spore’s DRM servers in a DDoS attack, that would be the best way to show all of the loyal consumers (like myself) who paid cash money for Spore just how unstable EA’s commitment to providing a game really is.

DDoS the DRM servers and no consumer could authenticate.

 

UK based BBC News reports that some believe the Patent System has gone awry.  Patents originally were intended to protect research performed by private entities by ensuring that royalties and licenses would be paid to the original researcher.  Today, companies file “fortress patents” to prevent rival companies from researching similar techniques or technologies.

A reasonable solution might be to specify a limitation on filing patents.  If a researcher does not self-produce the object of the patent and make it available, then perhaps the patent should be made to expire sooner?

It’s hard for me to speculate as I know virtually nothing about the system, other than the broadstrokes reason for the Patent office’s existance.

 

Heller Ehrman has announced bankruptcy and a soon-to-be former Heller employer has started a blog to keep the exiting employees as they “abandon ship.”

It’s a sad state.  Heller Ehrman was a good place to work while I was there (sans the manager from hell who managed me and the telecom group for 2.5 years…)  The benefits were excellent, the attorneys were self centered and somewhat obtuse when it came to interpersonal skills as a general rule, but there were some nice attorneys that I met over my 4 year term.

All in all, if it wasn’t for one particular co-worker, getting screwed in my career growth by the manager and of course the lack of career path opportunities, I’d still be there.  My last manager was excellent (not that everyone agreed with me, but he supported me and promoted me to management in such a way that I was able to keep my job after the telecom department dissolved…  as they had fired the manager from hell and moved everyone under the network operations department.)

I was not familiar with the business aspect of the company, nor was I engaged in the office politics (and there were some…  my refusal to play the politics is part of what hurt my career there.  Of course, some wiser than myself would suggest that refusal to play office politics is just another form of office politics, but whatever.)

I moved on, I left with no hard feelings and I look back and say “yes, there were tough times, and despite the fact that it had its share of little people with big egos and attitudes, Heller Ehrman was mostly filled with good people.”

 

Addition:

What’s kind of scary/sad about this is the fact that Heller Ehrman was founded 118 years ago.  This company weathered the Great Depression, and now it founders on a major rescession.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/09/26/BUQF135ES8.DTL

http://sanfrancisco.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/stories/2008/09/22/daily60.html

Favorite Books

Favorite Music

© 2011 Undecided Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha