I’m in a debate about Hard vs Soft science fiction, in my UCLA X455 English class (World Building for Fiction, Short Stories, by Alyx Dellamonica. While I’ve previously discussed this topic, the conversation forced me to refine my opinions. In the process of researching my position, I came across quite a bit of interesting (nearly current) journalism on the topic of suspended animation (cryogenics, cryostasis).
I, of course, started with Wikipedia (doesn’t everyone?) on the topic of Cryogenics… because honestly, I can’t remember the last story I read where someone was still putting forth the idea of suspended animation. While the science still looks feasible, we continue to run in to a lot of biological issues with attempts to perform suspended animation tests. But progress is being made (albiet slowly). In 2005, Pitts Safar scientists resurrected the hope of cheating death by showing conclusive proof that temperature induced hibernation extended the time doctors had to treat critically injured patients (by doing a series of tests on dogs where they chilled the body to 50 degrees and ex-sanguinated 40% of the dogs blood to simulate traumatic blood loss). In 2007, Dr. Hasan Alam was featured in a digital journal article about the race to be first to ‘hibernate’ human beings. While Dr. Alam‘s work was more focused on extending the time that doctors have to work on critically injured patients (just like Dr. Patrick Kochanek from the 2005 article above), there were scientists from UCLA looking at taking this research in to suspended animation, permitting patients to be placed asleep for extended (possibly indefinite) periods. Hibernation research received a boost in interest because of a Japanese man who reportedly fell down a well and was in hibernation (near death) for 24 days.
Most recently, Dr. Alam has been continuing his research, conducting suspended animation trials on trauma patients in Massachusetts. The article had a catchy conclusion: You’re not dead till your body reaches room temperature. What’s more, when combined with other modern research, it looks more and more likely that mankind will develop some kind of suspended animation technique in the near future. For instance, Mark Roth has a key to suspended animation: Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S), normally a toxic substance, in small quantities can bond with oxygen receptors and induce a state that will slow the biological self destruction that occurs at death (specifically it lowers the metabolism and reduces the need for oxygen, at least until it is removed.)
I happen to love TED, so whenever I get a chance to watch a new presentation, it’s a special treat. (I’ve not had a chance to watch the whole thing yet, but I’ll watch it soon.)
If Mark Roth, and other scientists/biologists in related fields, are right, we may be looking at more and more clinical trials where trauma patients are put in to a state of suspended animation for transport from the scene of the injury to the hospital where they will be treated. The more common this becomes, the more information scientists/biologists will have about the effects of suspended animation techniques on the human body. The more information we have, the faster research will accelerate towards true suspended animation.
Ultimately, the problem is that no one healthy would voluntarily give up their limited lifespan (even if that total life span was only 70-80 years) to test for long term suspended animation. But, the rapid advances in suspended animation might allow someone to take extended cold-naps, drastically extending their lifespan (or even permit us to place someone in suspended animation for interstellar travel, or to permit a terminal patient to be stored until a cure can be devised.)
Imagine the potential benefit to terminal disease patients (i.e., cancer or HIV). Imagine one of the polar zones becoming home to giant tombs of suspended animation capsules, waiting for the day when they can be revived, their injuries mended, their diseases cured.





Follow me on Twitter